Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Emerging Market Finance
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cointegration and Market Efficiency

Richard J. Sweeney

Asset markets in emerging-market economies are generally thought to be less efficient than the larger, more liquid and thick markets in some rich economies. This suggests the possibility of profiting by detecting inefficiencies in emerging asset markets. A number of authors suggest that one way of looking for opportunities is to test asset prices for cointegration. This article points out that cointegration among asset prices, or its lack, has no impli cations by itself for efficiency. If risk premia are time-varying, then it is possible that cointegration and the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH) jointly hold. There are strong restrictions, however, on how risk premia must vary to ensure that cointegration and the EMH actually hold. These restrictions mean that the finding of cointegration allows sharper, more structured tests of the EMH. First, the parts of assets' rates of return that are predictable from cointegration must equal risk premia. Since the predictable parts of cointegrated assets' rates of return vary over time, risk premia must vary pari passu. Priced risk factors beyond the market are generally required; thus, the Capital Asset-Pricing Model (CAPM) is highly unlikely to be consistent with cointegration and efficiency. The betas, not the risk premia, of at least some priced non-market risk factors must depend on the cointegrating error. Second, the parts of assets' rates of return that are not predictable from cointegration must be explicable cross-sectionally in terms of risk-factor realisations and idiosyncratic error terms. Further, the forecast errors' dependence on realisations of non-market risk factors must vary over time with the cointegrating error.

Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Vol. 2, No. 1, 41-56 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/097265270300200102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?