Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Emerging Market Finance
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajan, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Investigation into the Economics of Extending Bank Powers

Raghuram G. Rajan

Policy-makers in many countries earnestly debate the extent of powers that commercial banks should be allowed. In contrast, some economists declare such a debate futile. Commercial banks should be allowed all powers, and competition will ensure they will adopt only those ones that they can perform competently. In other words, they argue, so long as competition is not arti ficially restricted, efficient institutions will emerge. This paper shows that unrestricted competition does not necessarily lead to efficient institutions if the markets in which institutions compete are not naturally competitive. Therefore, the debate on what powers banks should have is relevant even from an efficiency point of view. More evidence is needed to convince policy- makers, especially in developing countries.

Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Vol. 1, No. 2, 125-156 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/097265270200100201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?